Author |
Message |
|
billyweeds |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 5:43 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 20618
Location: New York City
|
bartist wrote: I was taught that the noun, if it end with an S, takes only an apostrophe. And I wasn't raised by wolves or anything like that. Newton, Mass. -- good public schools.
Was your MOTW assessment in any way influenced by the presence of Oprah in the cast?
Sorry--you were taught WRONG. Right on, whiskey!!!
There was a Broadway revue called (by the producers) Jerome Robbins' Broadway. Every time The New York Times referred to the show they "changed" the title (correctly) to "Jerome Robbins's Broadway." |
|
|
Back to top |
|
billyweeds |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 5:50 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 20618
Location: New York City
|
This no-extra-apostrophe nonsense reaches its apex of horror in such constructions as the already mentioned "Thomas' doubt." How would you pronounce "'Hound Dog' was one of Elvis' big hits"? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
whiskeypriest |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:08 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 6916
Location: "It's a Dry Heat."
|
jeremy wrote: "The Help", "The Butler"...It might be wishful thinking, but America seems to want to reach a settlment or cast a new narrative for the post-racial era. All very nice, but these films bore me something rotten.
On the subject of apostrophes, generally, I think plurals shouldn't have a further 's' added, but other words ending in 's' can depending on whether or not it sounds natural: Jones' legacy, the dogs' food, Thomas's doubt. I will say this in favor of Lee Daniels's The Butler: it avoids the !Glory syndrome, Hollywood's belief that black historical and civil rights stories should be told from a white perspective in order to not scare off a white crowd. It os completely, in all of its foci, black on its perspective. |
_________________ I ask you, Velvel, as a rational man, which of us is possessed? |
|
Back to top |
|
whiskeypriest |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:13 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 6916
Location: "It's a Dry Heat."
|
marantzo wrote: "Mrs. Trovillion would turn over in her grave if she was dead."
....if she were dead. (Shame on you.)
Was I taught incorrectly about that also?  That was deliberate. Just seeing if anyone was paying attention. |
_________________ I ask you, Velvel, as a rational man, which of us is possessed? |
|
Back to top |
|
whiskeypriest |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:15 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 6916
Location: "It's a Dry Heat."
|
billyweeds wrote: bartist wrote: I was taught that the noun, if it end with an S, takes only an apostrophe. And I wasn't raised by wolves or anything like that. Newton, Mass. -- good public schools.
Was your MOTW assessment in any way influenced by the presence of Oprah in the cast?
Sorry--you were taught WRONG. Right on, whiskey!!!
There was a Broadway revue called (by the producers) Jerome Robbins' Broadway. Every time The New York Times referred to the show they "changed" the title (correctly) to "Jerome Robbins's Broadway." I consider this definitive. All debate shall cease. Correct your usages, pepple. |
_________________ I ask you, Velvel, as a rational man, which of us is possessed? |
|
Back to top |
|
knox |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:33 am |
|
|
Joined: 18 Mar 2010
Posts: 1246
Location: St. Louis
|
Going with the Chicago Style Manual, Jeremy, et al. - one should go by which sounds more natural. Thomas and Elvis have vowels right before the "S" and so need the extra S. Names like Chambers or Robbins, where the "S" becomes a Z-sound that follows a consonant, don't need the extra S. Hope I haven't made an S of myself.
Marc's Papal pronouncements whenever people digress: really, this digression was on topic, given the Lee Daniels apostrophe catastrophe. I read the whole chat as way of saying "the punctuation is more interesting than the film." |
|
|
Back to top |
|
billyweeds |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:45 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 20618
Location: New York City
|
The Butler (I categorically refuse to use the new title) sounds like an excellent film, like Forrest Gump if it were a good movie. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
bartist |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:54 am |
|
|
Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 6961
Location: Black Hills
|
This chat has succeeded in making me not care anymore. But if anyone dares to call the monster in Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley's masterpiece "Frankenstein," I am prepared to open up a big can of whup-tush and unload a world of pain! Refer to it as "the monster," or "Frankenstein's monster," and we will be happily putting on the Ritz. |
_________________ He was wise beyond his years, but only by a few days. |
|
Back to top |
|
Syd |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:57 am |
|
|
Site Admin
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 12929
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
|
bartist wrote: This chat has succeeded in making me not care anymore. But if anyone dares to call the monster in Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley's masterpiece "Frankenstein," I am prepared to open up a big can of whup-tush and unload a world of pain! Refer to it as "the monster," or "Frankenstein's monster," and we will be happily putting on the Ritz.
You mean he didn't get his father's surname? |
_________________ Rocky Laocoon foretold of Troy's doom, only to find snaky water. They pulled him in and Rocky can't swim. Now Rocky wishes he were an otter! |
|
Back to top |
|
bartist |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:21 am |
|
|
Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 6961
Location: Black Hills
|
He, he! Take it up with Ms. Shelley - if you can manage to reanimate her.
RIP ELMORE! |
_________________ He was wise beyond his years, but only by a few days. |
|
Back to top |
|
Joe Vitus |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:28 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 14498
Location: Houston
|
bartist wrote: This chat has succeeded in making me not care anymore. But if anyone dares to call the monster in Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley's masterpiece "Frankenstein," I am prepared to open up a big can of whup-tush and unload a world of pain! Refer to it as "the monster," or "Frankenstein's monster," and we will be happily putting on the Ritz.
I'd be more frustrated by someone calling that imaginative and innovative but hopelessly clunky and clumsily realized work of fiction with leaden characters spouting unspeakable dialogue a "masterpiece". |
_________________ You've got a great brain. You should keep it in your head.
-Topher |
|
Back to top |
|
billyweeds |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:37 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 20618
Location: New York City
|
Joe Vitus wrote: bartist wrote: This chat has succeeded in making me not care anymore. But if anyone dares to call the monster in Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley's masterpiece "Frankenstein," I am prepared to open up a big can of whup-tush and unload a world of pain! Refer to it as "the monster," or "Frankenstein's monster," and we will be happily putting on the Ritz.
I'd be more frustrated by someone calling that imaginative and innovative but hopelessly clunky and clumsily realized work of fiction with leaden characters spouting unspeakable dialogue a "masterpiece".
LOL. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
bartist |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 11:22 am |
|
|
Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 6961
Location: Black Hills
|
Ha! No worries, then - I was using "masterpiece" with tongue in cheek.
Young Frankenstein, however - that IS a masterpiece.
MEL BROOKS' masterpiece. Cough. Cough. |
_________________ He was wise beyond his years, but only by a few days. |
|
Back to top |
|
billyweeds |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:09 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 20618
Location: New York City
|
Word of mouth is making We're the Millers a smash hit. Yay! Once in a while there is God.
And, no, Millers is not a great movie. But it is laugh-packed, something no comedy since Bridesmaids has been.
(Sorry, Gary. Once in a while there is another Signs, and it's called Bridesmaids.) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
marantzo |
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:50 pm |
|
|
Guest
|
I'll be seeing The Wolverine this afternoon. Should be a lot of laughs there. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|